Cases 21 - 30 of 60
ENGLISH v. COOK INCORPORATED, et al.
as 1:2017cv00172
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENGLISH v. COLVIN
as 2:2016cv00361
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
DONNA L. ENGLISH
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
HALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC
as 2:2016cv00353
Defendant:
ARAMARK LLC, ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
HALL and SCOTT HALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARBLE v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00345
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MARBLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PURDY v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00337
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
KEITH PURDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KIEFNER v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00329
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. KIEFNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
RUSH v. ARAMARK LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00325
Defendant:
ARAMARK FOOD SERVICES, ARAMARK LLC and JASON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
DONALD RUSH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GROSS v. ENGLISH et al
as 2:2016cv00127
Defendant:
MS. DANIELS, BILLY ENGLISH, HAMBLIN and others
Plaintiff:
ANDREW GROSS, III
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KINNINGHAM et al v. KNIGHT
as 2:2015cv00144
Defendant:
PENNY ALEE, JASON ENGLISH, ELESHA HILDAGO and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JAMES ANGLEMYER and SHAWN WAYNE KINNINGHAM
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
