Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 541
LASECKI v. SAUL
as 2:2019cv00173
Defendant: ACTING COMM'R NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Plaintiff: MARTIN L. LASECKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
HATTEN v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01741
Plaintiff: KEVIN L. HATTEN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
JANUSIEWICZ v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01125
Plaintiff: ANTHONY J JANUSIEWICZ, JR and ANTHONY J. JANUSIEWICZ, JR.
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SPICER v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01365
Plaintiff: SUZANNE M SPICER and SUZANNE M. SPICER
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
RITCHIE v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv00084
Plaintiff: JOHN L. RITCHIE
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SWAIN v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00152
Plaintiff: BEVERLY SWAIN
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
EDMISTON v. SAUL
as 4:2019cv00081
Plaintiff: TAMILLA L. EDMISTON
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
BUNNELL v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01339
Plaintiff: ANGINETTA BUNNELL
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WAIDLICH v. SAUL
as 1:2019cv01575
Plaintiff: KIMBERLY S. WAIDLICH
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GRADY v. SAUL We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv01888
Plaintiff: TAMIKA L. GRADY
Defendant: NANCY A. BERRYHILL and ANDREW M. SAUL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?