Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 4,592
ROYAL v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00738
Petitioner: DENAR ROYAL
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
COVINGTON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00740
Petitioner: DAVID GEAN COVINGTON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ANDERSON v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2024cv00156
Petitioner: LLOYD ANDERSON
Respondent: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SHELTON v. STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
as 1:2024cv00707
Plaintiff: FELICIA Y. SHELTON
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SERVICES FOSTER CARE UNIT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
MARSHALL v. WADAS et al
as 2:2024cv00140
Defendant: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, J. WADAS, BOP and others
Plaintiff: BRIAN K. MARSHALL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SULLIVAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff: JAMES D. SULLIVAN
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
TAEBEL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff: MITCH TAEBEL
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA, ERIC HOLCOMB and ROKITA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 t Diversity-Torts
REDWINE v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00071
Plaintiff: SHAWN M. REDWINE
Defendant: STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00640
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: Karel Farahan, in her capacity as Personal Representative of the Estate of Abraham Farahan
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FARAHAN
as 1:2024cv00641
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: David Farahan

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?