Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03319
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1421 Immigration: Naturalization Authority
PERALES v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2017cv02268
Plaintiff:
AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DESERT-MOUNTAIN REGION -- BARSTOW OFFICE, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
CONERLY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2017mc00019
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL AARON BONNER, DETRICK CURTIS CONERLY and JOHN MENO CRUZ
Defendant:
MS. KATHLEEN KANE, PARAN LLP and TOM WOLF
CRUZ et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv00721
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA JAMES CRUZ and MIGUEL CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CRUZ v. JULIAN
as 2:2016cv00371
Petitioner:
JORGE CRUZ
Respondent:
S. JULIAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAENZ v. USA
as 1:2015cv00969
Petitioner:
CRUZ SAENZ
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00187
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRUZ-CRUZ v. SUPERINTENDENT
as 2:2013cv00297
Petitioner:
GONZALO CRUZ-CRUZ
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA and SUPERINTENDANT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DE LA CRUZ v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
as 2:2012cv00113
Plaintiff:
RICARDO DE LA CRUZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
WRIGHT v. LOCKETT et al
as 2:2012cv00096
Defendant:
D. BURKS, J. CRUZ, CAPTAIN JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL WRIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
