Cases 31 - 40 of 292
KEEYLEN v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2019cv00190
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, VEYONA SHEPHERD, PAUL A. TALBOT and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEEYLEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv00054
Plaintiff:
THEODORE DAVIS
Defendant:
PAUL A. TALBOT, CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL, INC., CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STURGIS v. MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITORS et al
as 1:2019cv00014
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, WEXFORD CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE, MEDICAL CONTRACT MONITOR(S) and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY LAVALLE STURGIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ABNEY v. CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY et al
as 1:2018cv03977
Plaintiff:
KEITH D. ABNEY
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL COMPANY/WEXFORD MEDICAL COMPANY, PLAINFIELD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, REBECCA J. TRIVETT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MARTIN v. ALSIP et al
as 1:2018cv03839
Defendant:
PRAITOR, BARGIT, BYDEM and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY C. MARTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PAYTON v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2018cv03858
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SERVICES, CORIZON MEDICAL and PAUL TALBOT
Plaintiff:
KEVIN PAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MIDDLETON v. WEXFORD
as 1:2018cv03539
Plaintiff:
JASON MICHAEL MIDDLETON
Defendant:
CORIZON and WEXFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIFFITH v. CORIZON, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03417
Defendant:
WEXFORD OF INDIANA, K. DAUSS, CORIZON, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES F. GRIFFITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HATFIELD v. HOBSON et al
as 2:2018cv00464
Defendant:
CORIZON MEDICAL SERVICE, RICHARD BRAUN, I.D.O.C. and others
Plaintiff:
LARRY HATFIELD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. CORIZON HEALTH MEDICAL PROVIDER, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv03165
Defendant:
LAURA BODKIN, TOM RICHARDSON, CAMAY FRANCUM and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN LAMONT ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
