Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC v. UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. et al
as 1:2009cv00836
Plaintiff:
BLAKE'S BEST SERVICES, LLC
Defendant:
UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC., UNIVERSAL PAVEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. and CARBONYTE SYSTEMS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
LANE v. RODDEN et al
as 4:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
FRANKLIN LANE
Defendant:
DANNY RODDEN, RICK ELLIOTT, SAM BEARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
DAVIS v BEST NURSES et al
as 1:2008cv01113
Plaintiff:
LATANNA DAVIS
Defendant:
BEST NURSES TOO, INC., MARY E. HERMANN and RONALD HERMANN, JR.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
AUTO MASTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. GILES AUTOMOTIVE, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00623
Plaintiff:
AUTO MASTER SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant:
GILES AUTOMOTIVE, INC., Z BEST CARS OF ALEXANDRIA, INC. and AUTOMOTIVE LEASING RECEIVABLES, LLC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
BEST et al STATE OF INDIANA
as 2:2007cv00272
Petitioner:
ALVIN MARK BEST
Plaintiff:
STATE OF INDIANA
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BEST et al v. SLAVENS et al
as 1:2007cv01197
Plaintiff:
ALVIN MARK BEST
Defendant:
PHILLIP SLAVENS, MICHAEL OSBURNE, TOUFLEMIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GETTER v. PARKES et al
as 2:2007cv00195
Plaintiff:
LEONARD GETTER
Defendant:
AL C. PARKES, ROHANA MARCEL, KAREN HARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
