Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 41 - 48 of 48
CHANDLER v. HANKS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00076
Plaintiff: KEVIN CHANDLER
Defendant: CRAIG HANKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv01516
Respondent: KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner: KEVIN CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHANDLER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00658
Defendant: DAVID CARNEY, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, OLIVER CLOUTHIER and others
Plaintiff: SHANTAY CHANDLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CHANDLER et al v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01593
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff: LUCY A. CHANDLER
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00827
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
MACKALL et al v. CATHEDRAL TRUSTEES INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00339
Defendant: GREG BAMRICK, BRYAN BANSCHBACH, MARC BEHRINGER and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
CHANDLER v. ASTRUE We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2008cv00755
Plaintiff: LUCY A. CHANDLER
Defendant: MICHAEL ASTRUE
Miscellaneou: SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
CHANDLER NATURAL GAS CORPORATION v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
as 3:2007cv00021
Plaintiff: CHANDLER NATURAL GAS CORPORATION and CHANDLER NATURAL GAS CORPORATION
Defendant: NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?