Cases 41 - 50 of 191
MCCULLAH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2022cv00365
Plaintiff:
JOHN JAVILLO MCCULLAH
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, T. J. WATSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
ROSA v. WONDER et al
as 2:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL ROSA, III
Defendant:
WONDER, MOREHEAD, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OGLE et al v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00286
Plaintiff:
BRYAN A. OGLE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. CRECELIUS, D. RUSSELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOWE v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
EDDIE J. LOWE
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DUSTY RUSSELL, C. HOLCOMB and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAINTIGNON v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00266
Plaintiff:
DANNY L. SAINTIGNON, JR.
Defendant:
VANIHEL, K. GILMORE, M. ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORTER v. HOLCOMB et al
as 2:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHORTER
Defendant:
C. HOLCOMB, DUSTY MILLER, FRANK VANIHEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SHORTER v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SHORTER
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, FAUST, WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00181
Plaintiff:
CAMERON T. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, DAVID ARCHER, COLE BANTA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. JOHN
as 1:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Defendant:
JOHN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ELLIS v. SEVIER
as 1:2022cv00626
Petitioner:
DEMAJIO JEROME ELLIS
Respondent:
SEVIER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
