Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 61 - 70 of 84
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01200
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01209
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01205
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al
as 1:2009cv01092
Plaintiff: ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant: JEFF WRIGLEY and DAVID L. ITTENBACH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. CREDITORS INTERCHANGE RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, LLC
as 1:2009cv01055
Plaintiff: ASHLEY D. SMITH, ASHLEY D. SMITH and ASHLEY D. SMITH
Defendant: CREDITORS INTERCHANGE RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2009cv01011
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00964
Plaintiff: ERIC D. SMITH
Defendant: JEFF WRIGLEY and EDWARD G. BUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SMITH v. WRIGLEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00906
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SMITH v. WRIGLEY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00031
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
SMITH v. WRIGLEY
as 1:2008cv01664
Petitioner: ERIC D. SMITH
Respondent: JEFF WRIGLEY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?