Cases 81 - 90 of 93
ROBINSON v. WINKLER-YORK
as 1:2013cv01059
Plaintiff:
JOSH ROBINSON
Defendant:
MELISSA WINKLER-YORK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PFLASTERER et al v. BARGA FARMS, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01819
Plaintiff:
LADONNA ASLINGER, DONALD BLIZZARD, JULIA CHAMP and others
Defendant:
RONALD L. BARGA, BARGA FARMS, INC., TRENTIN J. KRITSCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
POCKET CITY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC. v. SEPULVEDA et al
as 3:2012cv00119
Defendant:
DR. ROOF, INC., JOSH MCINTYRE and RICK SEPULVEDA
Plaintiff:
POCKET CITY CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
TONEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00378
Respondent:
KETH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOSH TONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TONEY v. BUTTS
as 1:2012cv00376
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
JOSH TONEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00089
Defendant:
MICHAEL ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
JOSH R. HILL
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
LIPE et al v. MONESSEN HEARTH SYSTEMS COMPANY
as 1:2011cv01684
Plaintiff:
HEATHER LIPE and JOSH LIPE
Defendant:
MONESSEN HEARTH SYSTEMS COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
KIRBY v. VIGO COUNTY
as 2:2009cv00265
Plaintiff:
JOSH KIRBY
Defendant:
VIGO COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
APPLE v. ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2008cv00206
Plaintiff:
ALBERT LEE APPLE
Defendant:
ORANGE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, INDIANA STATE POLICE, JOSEPH LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
