Cases 81 - 90 of 109
PIERCE v. PETERSON et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Defendant:
J. D. BALINGER, BINION, BUSINESS OFFICE and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER PIERCE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MCGRAW v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2012cv00849
Defendant:
ALAN ALSIP, BARR, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND MCGRAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROOKS vs. KIDDER et al.
as 1:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
JAMAINE D BROOKS
Defendant:
HARTLEY, JOHN DOES/JANE DOES, MICHAEL KIDDER and others
Miscellaneou:
OFFICE OF THE INDIANA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. FLOWERS et al
as 1:2012cv00564
Defendant:
GEORGE CRAIG, MRS. FLOWERS, C A PENFOLD and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2012cv00559
Defendant:
S. BENARD, KNUCKLES, L'TIA LEWIS and others
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MAY v. BUTTS et al
as 1:2012cv00259
Defendant:
DUANE ALSIP, Lt. JEREMY ASHBY, KEITH BUTTS and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M. MAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
PETERSON v. MARVELL et al
as 1:2011cv01122
Defendant:
OFFICER M. BALLARD, LIEUTENANT R. MARVELL and DOCTOR WILLIAM WOLFE
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PETERSON v. FINNAN
as 2:2011cv00101
Respondent:
ALAN P. FINNAN
Petitioner:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PETERSON v. ROGAN et al
as 2:2011cv00007
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES PRESIDENT and DOCTOR MICHAEL ROGAN
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE PETERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
