Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 71,293
BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. RUTHERFORD We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2024cv00912
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
FULLER v. MICHAELS STORES, INC.
as 1:2024cv00928
Plaintiff: JUDITH FULLER
Defendant: MICHAELS STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
THANGNGET v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff: TLUANG THANGNGET
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MISHLER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 2:2024cv00263
Plaintiff: CAMDEN MISHLER
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, DURREGAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KNOWLES v. O'MALLEY
as 4:2024cv00069
Plaintiff: TREVOR C. KNOWLES
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
WAGNER v. NAWAZ et al
as 1:2024cv00878
Plaintiff: TERRELL WAGNER
Defendant: ATHER NAWAZ and EAGLE TRANSPORT, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
DAVIS v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv00877
Plaintiff: JAMES O. DAVIS
Defendant: MARTIN O'MALLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
YAMAMOTO-CASTILLO v. CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00879
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER JAMES YAMAMOTO-CASTILLO
Defendant: CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?