Cases 1 - 10 of 25
PRUDEN et al v. DAVIS
as 3:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
TODD A. RUSSELL, SHANE C. HEDRICK, RICHARD J. CALHOUN and others
Defendant:
W. DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWSTER v. TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. et al
as 2:2024cv00178
Plaintiff:
BARBARA JEAN BREWSTER
Defendant:
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DEPT. and CALHOUN COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
CALHOUN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2022cv01030
Plaintiff:
BOB CALHOUN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CALHOUN v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv02091
Plaintiff:
SHAWN CALHOUN
Defendant:
Acting Comm'r KILOLO KIJAKAZI and KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
PERRY v. MYERS et al
as 1:2019cv04885
Defendant:
CINDY WEISNER, JOHN MARTOCIA, HOLLEY CALHOUN and others
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN JOSEPH PERRY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NOLAN v. MYERS et al
as 1:2019cv04624
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO NOLAN
Defendant:
HOLLY CALHOUN and MATT MYERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPENCER v. WEISNER et al
as 1:2019cv04077
Defendant:
MATT MEYERS, HOLLY CALHOUN, CINDY WEISNER and others
Plaintiff:
AMANDA DELEAN SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. MYERS et al
as 1:2019cv04040
Defendant:
MYERS and HOLLY CALHOUN
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAUDILL v. MYERS et al
as 1:2019cv03156
Defendant:
HOLLEY CALHOUN, JOHN MARTOCIA, ROBINSON and others
Plaintiff:
CATINA CAUDILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
