Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of Indiana
WHITE v. FORESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv01246
Defendant: KENNY FORESTAL, BAKER and JAMES MARTIN
Plaintiff: DAVID M. WHITE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WHITE v. WALMART, INC. et al
as 1:2021cv00525
Plaintiff: CHRISTINA M. WHITE
Defendant: WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP D/B/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER, WALMART, INC. and WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP D/B/A WAL-MART SUPERCENTER doing business as WAL-MART SUPERCENTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
NEBRASKA ALLIANCE REALTY CO/BMO HARRIS BANK v. WHITE et al
as 1:2016cv01437
Defendant: CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA, COUNTY OF MARION, INDIANA, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY and others
Plaintiff: NEBRASKA ALLIANCE REALTY CO/BMO HARRIS BANK AS SECURED PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
WHITE v. THOMAS AND KING, INC, et al
as 1:2013cv00607
Defendant: COLLEEN MEYER, NJ, GREGORY MEYER, NJ and THOMAS AND KING, INC.
Plaintiff: HEIDI M. WHITE, In
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
RINCON v. J P GRAHAM TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv00643
Defendant: J P GRAHAM TRANSPORT, INC. and RONALD M. WHITE
Plaintiff: MARIA RINCON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
GREG DAWSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. v. WHITE et al
as 1:2009cv00942
Plaintiff: GREG DAWSON & ASSOCIATES, INC. and GREG DAWSON & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Defendant: JEFFREY M. WHITE, JEFFREY M. WHITE, TOP GUN SALES & MARKETING, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Type: Contract None
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00709
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00076
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?