Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROLLINS v. OSBORNE et al
as 1:2024cv01525
Defendant:
MARI MILLER, JOHN DOE, ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
EVAN ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BURKE v. MYERS et al
as 1:2023cv01386
Plaintiff:
BRIAN BURKE
Defendant:
RICK MYERS, HARDIN, DAVISSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MCDONALD v. ROLLINS et al
as 1:2020cv02483
Plaintiff:
ELMER McDONALD
Defendant:
DART TRANSIT COMPANY, KEVIN E ROLLINS and KEVIN E. ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLLINS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv03988
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
JOANDRA ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROLLINS v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00139
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
MINDY ROLLINS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
ALEXANDER et al v. SVC MANUFACTURING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01636
Plaintiff:
SHA'RON ALEXANDER, ROBERT BENTLEY, MICAH BRADLEY and others
Defendant:
PEPSICO, STOKELY VAN-CAMP, INC. and SVC MANUFACTURING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv01468
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROLLINS v. TREHAN et al
as 1:2012cv01336
Defendant:
M B TRANSPORTATION & WAREHOUSING, LLC and JOSEPH W. TREHAN
Plaintiff:
YOSKISHA ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
ROLLINS v. LOCKETT
as 2:2011cv00035
Respondent:
CHARLES L. LOCKETT
Petitioner:
ROBERT DARYL ROLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
