Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MOORE v. SHROYER et al
as 2:2020cv00005
Defendant:
K. GILMORE, LITTLEJOHN, RICHARD BROWN and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00263
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
MOORE v. SMITH et al
as 1:2018cv00487
Defendant:
AMANDA ADAMS, ROBERT SHRINER, JIM SMITH and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. PETTY et al
as 2:2015cv00263
Defendant:
GARLAND, GIBBY, SGT. JOYNER and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. FISCHER et al
as 2:2015cv00260
Defendant:
S. FISCHER, GARLAND, GIBBY and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MOORE et al
as 1:2015cv00923
Defendant:
JAMIE L. GRIFFIN and JOHNNY T. MOORE
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
MOORE v. BROWN
as 2:2015cv00045
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOORE et al v. BROWN et al
as 2:2014cv00364
Defendant:
DICK BROWN, ROBERT D. BUGHER, S. CARPENTER and others
Plaintiff:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Miscellaneou:
WVCF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. BROWN
as 2:2014cv00229
Respondent:
DICK BROWN
Petitioner:
GARGANUS T. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO et al v. HASKELL
as 1:2013cv02017
Plaintiff:
DAN T. MOORE COMPANY and MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO
Defendant:
JOHN R. HASKELL
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
