Cases 91 - 100 of 845,699
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07559
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Raynor v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00053
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of General Counsel
Plaintiff:
Lisa Raynor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
LOBO v. KRECKEL et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Defendant:
TPD DESIGN HOUSE LLC and VANESSA D KRECKEL
Plaintiff:
ALAN LOBO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
HOLLON v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05764
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
PAUL HOLLON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
HANDRAN v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05765
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK INC. and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HANDRAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CANADA v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv05766
Plaintiff:
TRINA CANADA
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SUMMERS v. NOVO NORDISK INC. et al
as 2:2024cv05767
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SUMMERS
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
PORTER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05768
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK, INC.
Plaintiff:
KAYLEE PORTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HUBER v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv05773
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S and NOVO NORDISK INC.
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE HUBER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
