Cases 1 - 10 of 212
Aker v. City of Dayton et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Octavian Aker
Defendant:
City of Dayton and Cassie Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Myers v. City of Frankfort et al
as 3:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Myers
Defendant:
City of Frankfort, Dustin Bowman and Larry G. Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferreiras v. The City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Ashley Ferreiras
Defendant:
The City of Covington, Douglas Ullrich and Anthony Fritsch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nutini v. City of Covington et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Michele Renee Nutini
Defendant:
City of Covington, C. Bell, Brian Valenti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warick v. Newsome et al
as 7:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Gary Warick
Defendant:
Dusty Newsome, Mr. Symshack, John Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker et al v. McDonald's Corporation et al
as 5:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Terrence Walker and Amber Bishop
Defendant:
McDonald's Corporation, City of Harrodsburg, Kentucky and J.D. Pal, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Farrow v. Vanceburg
as 0:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Janet Farrow
Defendant:
City of Vanceburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pate v. City of Georgetown Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00319
Plaintiff:
Whitney Pate
Defendant:
City of Georgetown Kentucky, Georgetown Police Department and Officer Aaron Moss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Baker v. The City of Jackson et al
as 5:2023cv00259
Plaintiff:
Dylon Baker
Defendant:
The City of Jackson, Officer Jeff Watts, Officer Brant Noble and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
