Cases 1 - 10 of 37
Dudley v. Martin et al
as 2:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Lakeisha Y. Dudley
Defendant:
Hon. David S. Martin, Kevin Brewer, Premier Properties, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Cantrell v. Conely et al
as 5:2021cv00227
Plaintiff:
Stephanie Lynn Music Cantrell and Slim Shady
Defendant:
Johnathan Matthew Conely, Snoop Serious Pimp Records LTD, Jay Z and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Oswald et al v. Beshear
as 2:2021cv00096
Plaintiff:
Jason Oswald, Karen Oswald, Elizabeth Sandfoss and others
Defendant:
Governor Andy Beshear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cooperrider et al v. Beshear et al
as 3:2021cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael VanWinkle, Andrew Cooperrider, Carol VanWinkle and others
Defendant:
Melissa Bybee-Fields and Andrew Beshear
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everage v. Welch et al
as 7:2020cv00010
Plaintiff:
Mary Joe Bundy Everage
Defendant:
Kevin Stephen Welch and Steven Bogard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Perkins et al
as 0:2019cv00099
Defendant:
James Skaggs, John R. Stamper, Thomas Perkins and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Scott Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Akers et al
as 7:2019cv00059
Defendant:
Finas Akers and Kevin Belcher
Plaintiff:
Aleisha Nicole Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfiester v. Thomas More College et al
as 2:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Joseph Pfiester
Defendant:
Thomas More College, David A. Armstrong, Kathleen Jagger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Boyer v. Shirley et al
as 6:2018cv00090
Plaintiff:
Tina M. Boyer
Defendant:
Allen Shirley, Bryan Shepherd, Sharita J. Liner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
