Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 101 - 110 of 7,528
Ast v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2024cv00012
Petitioner: John Raymond Ast
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Essex v. USA
as 5:2024cv00029
Petitioner: John Michael Essex
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Robertson v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00027
Plaintiff: Demetrius M. Robertson
Respondent: Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rodriguez v. USA
as 7:2024cv00011
Plaintiff: Luis Rodriguez
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Gilley
as 6:2024cv00010
Petitioner: Anthony D. Taylor
Respondent: John Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Reed v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2024cv00009
Plaintiff: Jasper Reed and Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Wellpath, LLC et al
as 0:2024cv00012
Plaintiff: Carlos Harris
Defendant: Wellpath, LLC, Betty Noble, Lacy Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bennett v. Commonwealth Kentucky
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff: Cecil Bennett
Defendant: Commonwealth Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sneed v. Little Sandy Correctional Complex
as 0:2024cv00010
Plaintiff: Robert Edward Sneed
Defendant: Little Sandy Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pierce v. LeMaster We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2024cv00007
Petitioner: David L. Pierce
Respondent: David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?