Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Thompson v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00111
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amy Robey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coffman v. Roby
as 6:2024cv00040
Petitioner:
Timothy S. Coffman
Respondent:
Amy Roby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thompson v. Cookie Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Kyle Thompson
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Allyson Lambert, Amanda Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hambrick v. Robey et al
as 2:2024cv00039
Petitioner:
Brandon Hambrick, Jr.
Respondent:
Amy Robey and Luther Luckett Correctional Complex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hightower v. Crews et al
as 5:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
James Hightower
Respondent:
Commissioner Cookie Crews, Branch Manager Jennifer Travis, Warden Kevin Mazza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Baker v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Heath Anthony Baker and Ashley N. Baker
Defendant:
UA White, Captain Taylor, Amy Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Boyle v. Madison County, Kentucky et al
as 5:2023cv00061
Plaintiff:
Amie O'Boyle
Defendant:
Madison County, Kentucky, Steve Tussey, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Applegate et al v. Robey
as 0:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Roy Applegate
Defendant:
Amy Robey and Heather McManis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curtis v. Trivette et al
as 0:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Tori Toni Curtis
Defendant:
Amy Trivette, Cookie Crews and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williamson v. Robey
as 2:2021cv00117
Petitioner:
Larry Williamson
Respondent:
Amy Robey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
