Cases 171 - 180 of 3,664
Barnett v. USA
as 5:2022cv00232
Petitioner:
Robert H. Barnett
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hart v. USA
as 0:2022cv00083
Petitioner:
Paul E. Hart
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Tyndale v. USA
as 6:2022cv00191
Petitioner:
Pete Anthony Tyndale
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Stroud v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 6:2022cv00167
Petitioner:
Michael Stroud, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
USA v. $16,399.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 2:2022cv00124
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$16,399.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Complaint for Forfeiture
Berry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Eric Berry, Sr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Goodloe v. USA
as 6:2022cv00166
Plaintiff:
Ronald Goodloe
Defendant:
USA, Barry and Peterkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hensley v. USA
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 5:2022cv00262
Petitioner:
Michael B. Hensley
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Yeary v. USA
as 7:2022cv00099
Petitioner:
Dustin I. Yeary
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.