Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Slusher v. United States Postal Service
as 2:2014cv00191
Plaintiff:
Justin Slusher
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
Indiana Farmers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Booker v. USA et al
as 3:2012cv00066
Plaintiff:
Martha J. Booker
Defendant:
USA and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tune v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2010cv00256
Plaintiff:
Garry Tune, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and United Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kidwell v. The Employment Standards Administration Office of Workers' Compensation Programs et al
as 3:2010cv00058
Plaintiff:
Bonnie L. Kidwell
Defendant:
The Employment Standards Administration Office of Workers' Compensation Programs and The United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Terry v. United States Postal Service et al
as 5:2009cv00066
Plaintiff:
David A. Terry
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and USA
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Clark v. United States Postal Service et al
as 0:2008cv00041
Plaintiff:
Kimberly A Clark
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and John E. Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
