Cases 191 - 200 of 30,943
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Payton-Deathrage v. Howdeshell et al
as 3:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Rose Payton-Deathrage
Defendant:
Malcom L. Howdeshell, Jr. and Clean Harbors Environmental Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Alley v. World Wide Carriers, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Garith Levi Alley
Defendant:
World Wide Carriers, Inc. and Balvir Dhurke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hargis v. USA
as 5:2024cv00098
Petitioner:
William Ray Hargis
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Montrail Forte
Defendant:
North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diversified Production LLC v. Horn et al
as 7:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Diversified Production LLC
Defendant:
James R. Horn and Congetta Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Rogers v. Blakeman
as 5:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Steven Rogers
Defendant:
Gina Blakeman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Lacy v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2024cv00065
Petitioner:
Marvell Jermaine Lacy, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Motus Freight, LLC v. DH Carrier Inc.
as 2:2024cv00041
Plaintiff:
Motus Freight, LLC
Defendant:
DH Carrier Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
