Cases 31 - 40 of 418
Brown v. Smith
as 0:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
Franklin Brown
Respondent:
Thomas B. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mekus v. Adams et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mekus
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Albert B. Chandler, III, Sherry Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Tomlin et al v. City of Eubanks et al
as 5:2022cv00200
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Tomlin and Marilyn B. Tomlin
Defendant:
City of Eubanks and Bobby Daws
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Jordan v. Ashland Warden Lemasters
as 0:2022cv00043
Petitioner:
Decker B. Jordan
Respondent:
Ashland Warden Lemasters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
J.A.L. et al v. Howard et al
as 5:2022cv00130
Plaintiff:
J. A. L., L. L. and B. P.
Defendant:
Dr. Christina Howard and Kamika Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelson v. Aziyo Biologics, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Horace B. Nelson, Sr.
Defendant:
Aziyo Biologics, Inc., Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kelley v. Stanzel, Inc. et al
as 6:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Malachi Kelley
Defendant:
Stanzel, Inc., P & Z Carolina Pizza, LLC, Charles H. Zoellers and others
McFarland et al v. Scott
as 7:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Sharon B. McFarland and Joseph Craig Reynolds
Defendant:
Timothy E. Scott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
