Cases 51 - 60 of 160
Adams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 7:2019cv00117
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Dominique Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watts v. USA et al
as 7:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Katrina Watts
Defendant:
Gregory Kizziah, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy, John and Jane Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. State of Kentucky et al
as 6:2019cv00258
Respondent:
Seargant Cathers, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Jason Moesley and others
Petitioner:
Marlon Jermaine Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Duvall v. U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 0:2019cv00100
Petitioner:
Duane Alan Duvall
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzalez v. Shelton et al
as 6:2019cv00228
Defendant:
Tommy W. Shelton, Federal Bureau of Prisons and USA
Plaintiff:
Sadiel Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
Crafton v. West et al
as 6:2019cv00229
Defendant:
USP McCreary, Mrs. Lawson, Mr. Carpenter and others
Plaintiff:
Joel D. Crafton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1331
McKim v. Dyer et al
as 6:2019cv00225
Defendant:
Mr. Dyer, Mr. Gomez, Dr. Cunningham and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Joe McKim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Johnson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 7:2019cv00061
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary Big Sandy Warden, D. Bailey and others
Petitioner:
Brian Courtney Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. John Does sued as "The Unknown Members of the Utilization Review Committee"
as 6:2019cv00011
Defendant:
R. Jones, Ian Connors, Dankqua Vibete and others
Plaintiff:
Leonard Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Fenwick v. U.S. Department of Justice et al
as 6:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, U.S. Department of Justice, J. Ray Ormond and others
Plaintiff:
Thelma Fenwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
