Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Ragouzis v. Hamilton et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Edgar T. Ragouzis and Edgar Thomas Ragouzis
Defendant:
Jr. Richardo O. Hamilton, John and Jane Doe(s) and ABC Legal Entities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
RLG Ashland LLC et al v. Restaurant Growth Services LLC
as 0:2024cv00019
Defendant:
Restaurant Growth Services LLC, O and O'Charley's LLC
Plaintiff:
RLG Ashland LLC and GCG Ashland LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Laureti v. Warden FCI-MIAMI et al
as 6:2023cv00216
Petitioner:
Marco Laureti
Respondent:
Warden FCI-MIAMI and O Lua
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Moore v. Green et al
as 0:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Timmathy Moore
Defendant:
James D. Green, C/O Smith, Blevins Zachray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. Akers et al
as 5:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
David Paul Vaughn
Defendant:
Sgt. Daniel Akers, Sgt. C. Griffin, Officer Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zelesnik v. Congressman Thomas Massie et al
as 2:2023cv00103
Defendant:
Congressman Thomas Massie, Mr. Cream, Judge Blau and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Brown v. Gilley
as 6:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Michael O. Brown
Respondent:
J. Gilley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Neaves v. Hampton et al
as 5:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Constance O Neaves
Defendant:
Tony Hampton, Steve Quire, E. Humphries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sadler v. Clifford et al
as 5:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sadler
Defendant:
Angela Clifford, Shelli Conyers Votaw, Dawn Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. FBOP et al
as 6:2021cv00204
Plaintiff:
Darregus Robinson
Defendant:
FBOP, Nurse Privett, C/O J. Cima and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
