Cases 11 - 20 of 56
Rollins v. Lane et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Lane, Department of C, Quetin Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bensfield v. Murray et al
as 4:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield
Defendant:
Deputy Murray, Deputy Nard, Deputy Hocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kassie Jo Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nationwide General Insurance Company v. 1616 Gardiner Lane, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00651
Plaintiff:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Defendant:
1616 Gardiner Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Mason v. Allen et al
as 5:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Sargent Steven Meredith, Warden Timothy Lane and Officer Johnathan Allen
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright et al v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv00455
Defendant:
Russell Crain, Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Norfolk Southern Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Mikesell and George Thomas Lee Bright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brown v. Lane et al
as 3:2020cv00370
Defendant:
Revelette, Deputy Warden Chris Hatton, Sgt. Devon Oliver and others
Plaintiff:
Robin Renee Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reckart v. 1300 Campbell Lane Operating Company, LLC
as 1:2020cv00073
Plaintiff:
Gary Paul Reckart, Jr.
Defendant:
1300 Campbell Lane Operating Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fl
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00180
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2019cv00194
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Kassie Jo Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
