Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Bruin v. White et al
as 5:2016cv00105
Plaintiff:
Brandon R. Bruin
Defendant:
Randy White , Dan Smith, Roger Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burke et al v. Thompson et al
as 5:2015cv00156
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Burke, Jr. and Jeremy Todd West
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Randy White, Joel Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 5:2015cv00142
Petitioner:
Christopher Dale Melton
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Melton v. Troutman et al
as 5:2015cv00137
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Melton
Defendant:
Angela Troutman, Michael Hogancamp and Keith Myers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melton v. Troutman
as 5:2015cv00138
Defendant:
Angela Troutman
Plaintiff:
Christopher Dale Melton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodhouse et al v. Skechers USA, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00471
Plaintiff:
Sarah Rodhouse , Misty Mackey , Sharon Mavis and others
Defendant:
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. , Skechers U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Melton v. Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00798
Plaintiff:
Thelma Melton
Defendant:
Skechers, U.S.A., Inc., Skechers, U.S.A., Inc. II and Skechers Fitness Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Melton v. Monroe County et al
as 1:2013cv00090
Plaintiff:
Billy Keith Melton
Defendant:
Monroe County, Eddie C. Lovelace, M. Brooke Buchanan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
York v. Clinton County, Kentucky et al
as 1:2012cv00026
Plaintiff:
William York
Defendant:
Clinton County, Kentucky , Gene Ferrill , Janice Parrigin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chapman v. Knight et al
as 1:2009cv00092
Plaintiff:
Nichole Chapman
Defendant:
William Knight, Jr., Ann Melton and Adair County, Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
