Cases 31 - 40 of 56
Jackson v. Risner et al
as 5:2014cv00103
Plaintiff:
Harold Delontay Jackson
Defendant:
Risner, Jenkins, Keller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2014cv00327
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ryan Anthony
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky , Brandon Brooks , Bryan Washer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Davis v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00150
Plaintiff:
Mary Davis , Gregory L. Fuqua , Clarence D. Jenkins, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Amazon.com.DEDC, LLC and Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McCarley v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00172
Plaintiff:
Ricky Douglas McCarley
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center and Bill Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Calloway v. Logan County Detention Center et al
as 1:2013cv00085
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Calloway
Defendant:
Logan County Detention Center and Bill Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
as 3:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
Leroy Jenkins, Jr.
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC
Cause Of Action: Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974
Jenkins et al v. J. Alexander's Restaurants, LLC
as 3:2012cv00851
Plaintiff:
Ronald R. Jenkins and Brenda Jenkins
Defendant:
J. Alexander's Restaurants, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Butts v. Deibler et al
as 4:2012cv00114
Plaintiff:
Marvin Butts
Defendant:
Geoffrey Deibler, Morganfield Police Department, City of Morganfield, Kentucky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jenkins v. Commonwealth of Kentucky
as 4:2012cv00068
Petitioner:
Benjamin Jenkins, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
