Cases 31 - 40 of 113
Brown v. Christian County Detention Center
as 5:2020cv00063
Defendant:
Christian County Detention Center
Plaintiff:
Marcus L. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00032
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Parker v. Nichols et al
as 5:2020cv00018
Plaintiff:
Corey David Parker
Defendant:
M. Nichols and Christian County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman v. Christian County Jail
as 5:2020cv00019
Plaintiff:
David Freeman
Defendant:
Christian County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clopton v. Boyd et al
as 5:2019cv00205
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, Sergeant Robison, Sergeant Joiner and others
Plaintiff:
Chasity D. Clopton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Mazza
as 3:2019cv00902
Respondent:
Kevin Mazza
Petitioner:
Christian Omar Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Vertical Bridge Development, LLC et al v. Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Planning Commission et al
as 3:2019cv00876
Defendant:
Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government and Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Planning Commission
Plaintiff:
Lifepointe Church of the Christian & Missionary Alliance, Inc. and Vertical Bridge Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00843
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Kentucky Counseling Center, LLC
as 3:2019cv00713
Plaintiff:
Christian Smith
Defendant:
Kentucky Counseling Center, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Boyd et al v. State of Kentucky et al
as 5:2019cv00136
Defendant:
Christian County, Kentucky, State of Kentucky and City of Hopkinsville, Kentucky
Plaintiff:
Torell DeWayne Boyd and Daniel Shawn Allison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
