Cases 1 - 10 of 162
Gay v. Cox Automotive, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00350
Defendant:
Cox Automotive Corporate Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Mary-Stuart Thompson Gay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cox v. Sholar et al
as 3:2024cv00092
Plaintiff:
Valencia Cox
Defendant:
Walt Sholar doing business as Bullitt County Sheriff, Dylan Curran doing business as Bullitt County Deputy Sheriff, Troy John doing business as Bullitt County Sheriff Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cox v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Dillon Garven Cox
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Whitlock v. Shelby County et al
as 3:2023cv00634
Plaintiff:
Bobby Bard Whitlock, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County, Darrell Cox, Kim Damon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Regina
as 3:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Claude Cox
Defendant:
Nurse Regina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HRG, PLLC et al v. JQOL, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
HRG, PLLC, James Riney and Doris Cox
Defendant:
JQOL, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Bedwell v. Dollar General Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bedwell
Defendant:
Dollar General Corporation and Susan Cox Kentucky, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Dunbar v. Clark et al
as 3:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Dairlwen Javon Dunbar
Defendant:
Dwayne Clark, Steve Durham, Eric Troutman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 nr Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00176
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Fair Credit Reporti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
