Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Walker v. Hartman
as 5:2024cv00103
Plaintiff:
Shannon Nicole Walker
Defendant:
J. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hartman v. Polaris Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
Roy Hartman
Defendant:
Polaris Industries, Inc. and Jared Carter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Keeling v. Hartman et al
as 5:2021cv00057
Defendant:
McCracken County, Kentucky, Matt Carter and Jeffery Hartman
Plaintiff:
Shelley E. Keeling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Union Underwear Company, Inc. v. Hartman
as 1:2017cv00136
Plaintiff:
Union Underwear Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Mark W. Hartman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hartman et al v. Thompson et al
as 3:2016cv00114
Plaintiff:
Chris Hartman , Sonja De Vries and Carla Wallace
Defendant:
Jeremy Thompson , Jason Drane and Brian Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abell et al v. Sky Bridge Resources, LLC
as 3:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
Stephen Abell , Michael Hartman , Robert Pugh and others
Defendant:
Sky Bridge Resources, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Hartman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00768
Plaintiff:
Scott J. Hartman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hartman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Catherine A. Hartman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2012cv00048
Plaintiff:
Patricia L. Hartman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hartman et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 1:2012cv00008
Plaintiff:
Keith H. Hartman, Calvin D. Strange and Eric T. Patton
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, Jackie Strode and Southern Health Partners
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
