Cases 51 - 59 of 59
Seamon v. Facebook, Inc.
as 3:2011cv00689
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Janet Seamon , LA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2511 Wiretapping
Williams v. Delaney et al
as 3:2011cv00165
Defendant:
Cody Butler, Tim Delaney, John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
David J. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. Amedisys, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00642
Defendant:
Amedisys, Inc., William F. Borne, Jeffrey Jeter and others
Plaintiff:
Wanda Corbin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Meco Environmental, LLC v. Johnson et al
as 3:2010cv00231
Defendant:
Raymond F. Derrickson and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Chavez v. Gautreaux, III et al
as 3:2009cv00972
Plaintiff:
Hugo Chavez and Hugo Chavez
Defendant:
Sid J. Gautreaux, III, Dennis Grimes, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Roland et al v. Green et al
as 3:2009cv00676
Plaintiff:
James Roland, Michael J Giambrone, Thomas E Bowden and others
Defendant:
Jason Green, Grady Layfield, Hank Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation
Billizone v. Le Blanc et al
as 3:2009cv00438
Plaintiff:
Ernest Billizone
Defendant:
James Le Blanc, Jeffrey Travis, Steve Rader and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Distefano v. Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana d/b/a Paragon Casino Resort et al
as 3:2009cv00252
Plaintiff:
Joseph Distefano, Jr., Joseph Distefano, Jr., Joseph Distefano, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana, Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana, Tunica Biloxi Indians of Louisiana and others
Cause Of Action: no cause specified
Clay v. Ouber et al
as 3:2008cv00748
Plaintiff:
Derick Clay
Defendant:
Chad Ouber, John Hughes, Jimmy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
