Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Roach v. Bossier Maximum Security Center et al
as 5:2018cv01118
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth J S Roach
Defendant:
Bossier Maximum Security Center and Asst Warden Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roach v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv01645
Plaintiff:
Gary Bertram Roach
Defendant:
USA and Warden F C I Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Columbia Gulf Transmission L L C v. Land Calcasieu Parish et al
as 2:2016cv00169
Defendant:
Land Calcasieu Parish, Larry Roach, Garry Roach and others
Plaintiff:
Columbia Gulf Transmission L L C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roach v. Warden of FCI Oakdale
as 2:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Gary B Roach
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roach v. Warden of FCI Oakdale
as 1:2015cv01215
Plaintiff:
Gary B Roach
Defendant:
Warden F C I Oakdale
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roach v. Air Liquide America Corp LP et al
as 2:2012cv03165
Plaintiff:
Keith Roach
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corp LP , American Optical Corp , Bob Schmidt Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Montgomery v. Lake Charles et al
as 2:2010cv01297
Plaintiff:
Kennith W Montgomery
Defendant:
City of Lake Charles, Randy Roach, Police Dept City of Lake Charles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Roach v. Graves et al
as 5:2009cv01129
Plaintiff:
Ellsworth S Roach
Defendant:
Graves, Caddo Correctional Center and Steve Prator
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. USA, et al
as 1:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Autry Lee Jones
Defendant:
United States of America, Condaleezza Rice, Harvey Lappie and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
James v. AequiCap Property & Casualty Insurance Co et al
as 2:2008cv01653
Plaintiff:
Justin James
Defendant:
AequiCap Insurance Company, Dennis G Roach and Mohamed F Juman
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
