Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Torres v. Burns & Wilcox, Ltd.
as 2:2020cv12024
Plaintiff:
Kyle Torres
Defendant:
Burns & Wilcox, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Golden et al v. Huron Township et al
as 2:2020cv10235
Defendant:
Huron Township, Adam Sheehan, Derek Lazarski and others
Plaintiff:
Rita Golden and Michael Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanctot et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11339
Plaintiff:
Erik Young, Paul Martinelli, Robert Mcgill and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
United States of America v. Currency $15,740 in funds from account: XXXXXXXXX2781 in the name of Dacal Enterprises Corporation at BB&T Bank, Winston-Salem, NC et al
as 2:2019cv11057
Defendant:
Currency $77,950.30 in funds from account: XXXXX8157 in the name of Genesis Health Care, Inc. at J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Currency $305.32 in funds from account: XXXXXX6841 in the name of Carlos Manuel Dacal Torres at PNC Bank, Detroit, MI, Currency $73,357.00 in funds from account: XXXXXXXXX2925 in the name of The Capote Group Corporation at SunTrust Bank, Atlanta, GA and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Benson Product Management LLC et al v. DetailXPerts Franchise System, LLC
as 2:2018cv11901
Plaintiff:
Benson Product Management LLC , Koray Benson , DC Eco Mobile Detailing, Inc. and others
Defendant:
DetailXPerts Franchise System, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams v. Trump et al
as 2:2018mc50276
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Adams
Defendant:
Donald J. Trump, Melania Trump, Ivanka Trump and others
United States of America v. Lozano-Torres
as 2:2017mj30650
Defendant:
Jose Tulio Lozano-Torres
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. Lozano-Torres
as 2:2017mj30650
Defendant:
Jose Tulio Lozano-Torres
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
