Cases 11 - 20 of 118
AHMED v. MAYORKAS et al
as 2:2022cv12015
Plaintiff:
MOHAMED MOHIELDEEN ABD AHMED
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and U.S Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Johnson v. FBI CJIS Division et al
as 2:2022cv11817
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
FBI CJIS Division, Cash America Pawn #3179, NICS Transaction Number (NTN): 1C2H2K97L and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv11782
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Duncan v. Waterstreet et al
as 2:2022cv11505
Plaintiff:
Annebelle V. Duncan
Defendant:
Ronald Waterstreet and Department of Justice
Adams v. Michigan, State of et al
as 1:2022cv11024
Plaintiff:
Mark Alan Adams
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Mary Adams Semcken, Susan Kay Adams and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv10226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Holmes v. United States of America Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
as 2:2021cv12521
Plaintiff:
Leonard Holmes
Defendant:
United States of America and United States of America Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Search/Seizure Warrant
as 2:2021mc51059
In Re:
Search/Seizure Warrant
Respondent:
Department of Justice
Gomez-Camarena v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11280
Defendant:
Immigration Review, Executive Office of, MERRICK GARLAND and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Gomez-Camarena
Day v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2021cv10991
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, ICE, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Dillia M. Day
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
