Cases 11 - 20 of 319
Clark v. Schiebner
as 2:2023cv11546
Petitioner:
Tony Clark
Respondent:
Warden James Schiebner and James Schiebner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. Burton Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv11028
Plaintiff:
Joseph Morgan
Defendant:
Burton Police Department, Tony Greenway, Cody Monroe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brown v. George et al
as 2:2023cv10675
Defendant:
Tony George, Eric, Tyrone Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Brown
McNeely v. Brooks et al
as 2:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Robbin McNeely
Defendant:
Anthony Brooks, Brian Warden, Dave Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv10158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jones v. Washington et al
as 2:2022cv11843
Plaintiff:
Isaac Keith Jones
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, Gretchen Whitmer, Kathy L. Warner and others
Ptak v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2022cv11736
Plaintiff:
Tony F Ptak
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hilberry v. Helping Hand Nursing Service, Inc. et al
as 5:2022cv10595
Plaintiff:
Toni Hilberry
Defendant:
Helping Hand Nursing Service, Inc. and Trion Solutions II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv10449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
United States of America v. Eight Thousand Seventy-Seven Dollars ($8,077.00) in U.S. Currency et al
as 2:2021cv12912
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eight Thousand Seventy-Seven Dollars ($8,077.00) in U.S. Currency, Century Arms TAS47 7.62mm Rifle, S/N RAS47093186, One 7.62mm Black Magazine and others
Claimant:
Tony Maurice Williams
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
