Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv13646
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Sosa et al v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2010cv12878
Plaintiff:
Caleb Sosa and Amparo Hernandez-Sosa
Defendant:
Jane/John Doe, Dwight Pearson, Gary Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kircsh v. Pearson Education, Incorporated
as 2:2010cv12289
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kircsh
Defendant:
Pearson Education, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv11422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Pearson et al v. SEIU Healthcare Michigan
as 2:2009cv12475
Plaintiff:
Jerry Pearson, Esta Faye Childs and Ray Murdaugh
Defendant:
SEIU Healthcare Michigan and SEIU Healthcare Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Type:
Labor
Pearson v. Thirty Sixth District Court
as 2:2008cv15246
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Pearson
Defendant:
Thirty Sixth District Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McNeal v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2008cv14937
Plaintiff:
Mario Smith McNeal and Mario Smith McNeal
Defendant:
Detroit, City of and Dwight Pearson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Pearson v. Palmer
as 2:2008cv14422
Petitioner:
Samuel Pearson
Respondent:
Carmen Palmer
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Electrical Workers Local 58 Pension Trust Fund et al v. Jeffrey Pearson
as 2:2008cv11208
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Local 58 Pension Trust Fund, Electrical Workers Joint Board of Trustees Vacation Fund, Electrical Workers Insurance Fund and others
Defendant:
Jeffrey Pearson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Pearson v. Bell
as 4:2007cv15107
Petitioner:
Lindsey Pearson
Respondent:
Thomas K Bell
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
