Cases 41 - 50 of 731
Grayson v. Sisco et al
as 4:2023cv10847
Plaintiff:
Deandre Cornell Grayson
Defendant:
Angir Sisco, Lura Brown, Margaret Quellete and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Potrykus v. McLaren Health Care et al
as 1:2023cv10813
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Potrykus
Defendant:
McLaren Health Care, McLaren Bay Region, McLaren Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396 - Tort Negligence
Johnson Chambers v. Michigan First Credit Union et al
as 4:2023cv10730
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Johnson Chambers
Defendant:
Michigan First Credit Union, Jeff Fitrzyk, Jennifer Borowy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Webster v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2023cv10704
Plaintiff:
Mark Webster
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, MRF, FNU Montgomery and others
Legg v. St. Vincent Home Care LLC
as 2:2023cv10693
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Legg
Defendant:
St. Vincent Home Care LLC d/b/a Compassus and St. Vincent Home Care LLC Doing business as Compassus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv10684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (handicap)
Reinig et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10663
Plaintiff:
Tina Reinig, Gloria Grover, Mary May and others
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Sachs v. Ricardo Inc. et al
as 5:2023cv10643
Plaintiff:
George Sachs and George Sachs Doing business as Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
Ricardo Inc., Wesley Scharmen, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Jensen et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2023cv10603
Plaintiff:
John Jensen, Ann Karfis, Todd Mustaine and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101 E.R.I.S.A.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
