Cases 81 - 90 of 189
Sango #252200 v. Heyns et al
as 1:2014cv00589
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Sango #252200
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Daphne M. Johnson, James MacEachern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Patterson #390905 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv00118
Plaintiff:
Wayman Patterson #390905
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns and Thomas G. Finco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis #227535 v. Smoker et al
as 1:2014cv00567
Plaintiff:
Edwin Lewis #227535
Defendant:
Mildred Smoker, James Bradley, Warren Link and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivera #239567 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv00214
Plaintiff:
Wilson Rivera #239567
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Daniel H. Heyns, Tom Finco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sango #252200 v. Heyns et al
as 2:2014cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Sango #252200
Defendant:
Daniel H. Heyns, Duncan MacLaren and Unknown Part(y)(ies)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nunlee #537539 v. Combs et al
as 1:2013cv01324
Plaintiff:
Dennis Howard Nunlee #537539
Defendant:
Thomas Combs, Amy Bonito, Barbara Sampson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Givens et al
as 1:2013cv01307
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Defendant:
Unknown Montana, Unknown Grant, Erica Huss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hudson #783970 v. McElvain et al
as 1:2013cv01218
Plaintiff:
Stephen Kaid Hudson #783970
Defendant:
H. McElvain, J. Corbett and D. Thebo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kinard #189372 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2013cv01169
Plaintiff:
Walter Kinard #189372
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, Thomas R. Combs, Daniel H. Heyns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dunbar #129278 v. Prelesnik et al
as 1:2013cv01100
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gregory Dunbar #129278
Defendant:
John Prelesnik, Cathleen Stoddard and Daniel H. Heyns
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
