Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Michigan
Cases 11 - 16 of 16
United States of America v. Gents 10kt White Gold Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, Weighing Approximately 30.6 Grams and Hanging from 4mm Wide Sterling Silver Diamond Cut Rope Chain, et al
as 1:2021cv00622
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Gents 10kt White Gold Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, Weighing Approximately 30.6 Grams and Hanging from 4mm Wide Sterling Silver Diamond Cut Rope Chain,, Gents 10kt Two Tone Diamond Pendant, With Custom #800 Design, With Raised Name L. Roy, Weighing Approximately 80.9 Grams and Hanging from A 22 Inch, 4mm Wide Diamond Cut Rope Chain, $5,605.00 United States Currency and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00100
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00690
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Doe v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2018cv01008
Defendant: USA Gymnastics, Inc., Michigan State University, Lawrence Gerard Nassar and others
Plaintiff: named as Jane NLF-3 Doe Unknown Party and Jane NLF-3 Doe
Interested Party: The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2018cv01016
Defendant: USA Gymnastics, Inc., Michigan State University, named as Jane NLF-4 Doe Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Michigan State University et al
as 1:2018cv01019
Defendant: USA Gymnastics, Inc., Lawrence Gerard Nassar, Michigan State University and others
Plaintiff: named as Jane NLF-4 DOE Unknown Party and Jane NLF -4 Doe
Interested Party: The Nichols Law Firm, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?