Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Alward v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2024cv00461
Plaintiff:
Matthew Keith Alward
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kuhl v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Samuel Alexander Kuhl
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States Marshal Service, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Williams v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2023cv00828
Petitioner:
Kenneth Williams
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Flowers #13667-040 v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Petitioner:
Ronnie Melvin Flowers #13667-040
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Marshal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Chavez v. Breckon et al
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Aaron Chavez
Respondent:
M. Breckon, United States Department of Justice and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00449
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jean v. Johns et al
as 1:2021cv00432
Defendant:
GEO Corporation, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Tracy Johns and others
Plaintiff:
Richekad Jean
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tate #145822 v. Michigan Parole Board et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
Curtis Tate #145822 and Willie Perry Woods
Respondent:
Michigan Parole Board, US Marshals Service and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Salazar v. Johns et al
as 1:2020cv01136
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Attorney General and T. Johns
Petitioner:
Guillermo Alfonso Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Parker v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2020cv00994
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, J. Fikes, Unknown Weber and others
Plaintiff:
Handsome Peter Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
