Cases 51 - 60 of 644
Fisher v. Precythe et al
as 2:2022cv00076
Plaintiff:
William Rydell Fisher
Defendant:
Ann L. Precythe, Redington, P. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Hacker
as 4:2022cv00866
Petitioner:
Rodney Vashon Williams
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wallace v. Williams
as 4:2022cv00983
Petitioner:
Antonio Wallace
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Redington
as 2:2022cv00069
Petitioner:
William J. Jones
Respondent:
Dan Redington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Grissom
as 2:2022cv00060
Petitioner:
Brayon Williams and Brayon Jerome Williams
Respondent:
Eldon Grissom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Harkey v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00111
Petitioner:
Ryan Perry Harkey
Respondent:
William Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pearson v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00806
Plaintiff:
William Malik Pearson, Jr.
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, State of Missouri, SLMPD Homicide Divl. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Grimes et al
as 4:2022cv00782
Plaintiff:
Nicolas Cortez Williams
Defendant:
Matthew Grimes doing business as St. Louis County Police Officer Grimes #04322 (Jennings) and Steve Pokorny doing business as CEO of STS Car Care
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. USA
as 4:2022cv00855
Petitioner:
Terrick Alfred Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Bowman v. Lester et al
as 4:2022cv00748
Plaintiff:
Robert M. Bowman
Defendant:
Captain Orville Lester, Summit Worker Shirley Unknown, Summit Worker Kristina Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
