Cases 121 - 130 of 2,992
Partee v. Lewis et al
as 4:2023cv01119
Defendant:
John Doe, Steven Lewis, Michael K. Mullen and others
Plaintiff:
Shelton Partee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shanklin v. St. Louis County et al
as 4:2023cv00996
Plaintiff:
Janet Shanklin
Defendant:
St. Louis County, Steven M. Ebert and Evan P. Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Biden
as 4:2023cv00934
Plaintiff:
Angelina Rogers
Defendant:
Joe Biden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Austell v. Washington University, EMBA #38
as 4:2023cv00871
Plaintiff:
Carmen R Austell and Carmen Austell
Defendant:
Washington University and Washington University, EMBA #38
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Varela et al v. Hill et al
as 4:2023cv01016
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Varela and Claudia Varela
Defendant:
William Harold Hill, City of Wildwood, St. Louis County Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O.D.F. v. Franklin County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00881
Plaintiff:
O.D.F.
Defendant:
Franklin County, Missouri, Steven M. Pelton, Khalid Ashkar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Benford v. Stimson
as 4:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
S. Stimson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Benford v. Dowd et al
as 4:2023cv00998
Plaintiff:
Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford
Defendant:
James M. Dowd, Robin Ransom and Gary M. Gaertner, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brotz v. City of Dexter, Missouri et al
as 1:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Brotz
Defendant:
City of Dexter, Missouri and Trevor Pulley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Emrit v. Jules
as 4:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Defendant:
Sabine Aisha Jules
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
