Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Knox et al v. J. Grady Randolph Inc.
as 4:2021cv01045
Plaintiff:
Pamela Knox and Randolph Dakin
Defendant:
J. Grady Randolph Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Knox et al v. J. Grady Randolph Inc.
as 2:2021cv00053
Plaintiff:
Pamela Knox
Defendant:
J. Grady Randolph Inc. and Randolph Dakin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
A.P. et al v. City of St. Louis, Missouri et al
as 4:2020cv01547
Defendant:
Pamela Clark, Andrew Vanderusen, Amber Bass and others
Plaintiff:
Angie Pollock, A.P., G.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ladiner v. Lowery et al
as 2:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Dean Minor, The Municipality of Randolph County in Moberly, Missouri, Anne Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Ladiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Street et al v. O'Toole et al
as 4:2019cv02590
Defendant:
Jeremiah Koerper, Jeffrey Long, Nick Henderson and others
Plaintiff:
Fudail McCain, Ashley Theis, Ronald Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. United States et al
as 4:2019cv01694
Defendant:
Allan D. Lourie, United States Court of Appeals Federal Circuit, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson and Jeffrey L.G. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2018cv00084
Defendant:
Stephen D. Hawke, Dean Minor, Joshua D. Hawley and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Quintin Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bishop v. Randolph County et al
as 2:2018cv00054
Defendant:
Moberly Regional Medical Center, Randolph County, Michaela Huber and others
Plaintiff:
Scott M. Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schmidt v. Norman
as 4:2018cv00601
Petitioner:
Randolph Schmidt
Respondent:
Jeff Norman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randolph v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 4:2017cv02838
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Randolph
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
