Cases 41 - 50 of 241
Grace-Bey v. Precythe et al
as 2:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
William Grace-Bey
Defendant:
Ryan Crews, Dean Minor, Bryce Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ladiner v. Lowery et al
as 2:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Dean Minor, The Municipality of Randolph County in Moberly, Missouri, Anne Precythe and others
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Ladiner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. Ripley County et al
as 1:2020cv00068
Defendant:
Ripley County, Joey Bruener, Charles Mays and others
Plaintiff:
Fred O'Neill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00365
Plaintiff:
Dean Bryant and Peggy Bryant
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wilmas v. Precythe et al
as 4:2019cv03289
Defendant:
Wendy Dashner, Mary Gould, President of Ashland University and others
Plaintiff:
Ralph T. Wilmas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vargas v. Minor et al
as 2:2019cv00084
Plaintiff:
Dennis Lee Vargas
Defendant:
Mary E. Teague, Dean Minor, Frank Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Commodity Futures Trading Commission et al v. Rust Rare Coin Inc. et al
as 4:2019mc00803
Defendant:
Aleesha Rust Franklin, Rust Rare Coin Inc., Denise Gunderson Rust and others
Plaintiff:
Commodity Futures Trading Commission and State of Utah Division of Securities
Receiver:
Jonathan O. Hafen
OKAL v. Wayne County, Missouri et al
as 1:2019cv00155
Defendant:
MARK YOUNT, JOHN PENNINGTON, LOGAN ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ODHIAMBO OKAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Okal v. Wayne County, Missouri et al
as 1:2019cv00156
Defendant:
MARK YOUNT, JOHN PENNINGTON, LOGAN ALLEN and others
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ODHIAMBO OKAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Minor
as 2:2019cv00066
Petitioner:
Steven Young
Respondent:
Dean Minor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
