Cases filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri
Cases 41 - 50 of 51,040
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00685
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Criner v. Adams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00416
Plaintiff: Phillip Criner
Defendant: Richard Adams, Samuel Snyder and CO I John Doe Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sesson v. Ruhman et al
as 4:2024cv00676
Plaintiff: Johnny Bruce Sesson, III
Defendant: Det. Crystal Ruhman, Det. Matthew Geisman and Det. Joseph Percich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lettieri v. Keete Group
as 4:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: David Lettieri
Defendant: Keete Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00429
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
NRRM, LLC v. Endurance Warranty Services, LLC
as 4:2024cv00412
Plaintiff: NRRM, LLC
Defendant: Endurance Warranty Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Take v. Acuity Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff: Brian Take
Defendant: Acuity Insurance Company and Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Type: Contract Insurance
Keys v. PNC Bank Headquarters
as 4:2024cv00677
Plaintiff: Sidney Keys, Sr.
Defendant: PNC Bank Headquarters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Miller v. Schelp
as 4:2024cv00674
Plaintiff: Matthew W. Miller
Defendant: Matthew T. Schelp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zuko v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00092
Petitioner: Sokol Zuko
Respondent: Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?