Cases 51 - 60 of 1,908
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01415
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Doe et al v. Lowery et al
as 4:2023cv01309
Plaintiff:
John doe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
Timothy J. Lowery, Missouri Public Entity Risk Management, Joseph Monahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Criddle v. Jackson County Sheriff Office et al
as 1:2023cv00183
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher Criddle
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff Office, Ruth Ann Dickerson, David James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01262
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
McKay Bey v. Vandergriff
as 4:2023cv01205
Petitioner:
Daniel Kornel McKay Bey
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Su et al v. Mundwiller
as 4:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Acting Sec of Labor Julie A. Su and Mundwiller Electric LLC doing business as Mundwiller Electric
Defendant:
David Mundwiller
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Mundwiller et al v. Mundwiller Electric, LLC
as 4:2023cv01158
Plaintiff:
David Mundwiller and Department of Labor
Defendant:
Mundwiller Electric, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
