Cases 1 - 10 of 36
State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey v. Biden et al
as 4:2024cv01063
Defendant:
Denis McDonough, Janet Yellen, Adrianne Todman and others
Plaintiff:
State of Missouri ex rel. Andrew Bailey
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ashcroft et al v. Biden et al
as 4:2024cv01062
Defendant:
Adrianne Todman, Department of Agriculture, Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
Plaintiff:
John Thurston, Jay Ashcroft, Kurt Bahr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Garland v. Gilmer et al
as 4:2024cv00930
Defendant:
Joan Gilmer and Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri
Plaintiff:
Eric A. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00902
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00836
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Reid v. Garland
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Terrell Reid
Defendant:
Merrick B. Garland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Perez v. Biden et al
as 1:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Jose A Perez
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Merrick B. Garland and US Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
